Rumanian Language: The Common „Indo-European” Language


The Aryan Epic | The great Aryan migration from Central and Southeastern Europe towards Northern India

Louis de La Vallée-Poussin (Histoire du monde. Indo-européens et Indo-iraniens. L’Inde jusque vers 300 av. J.C.): “The inhabitants of northern Lower Danube can be regarded as the places of origin of Indo-European languages, meaning the ancestors of Humanity.”

The word “Arya” in Sanskrit means “good”, “noble”, “civilized”, while in Rumanian the words “Aria” means “Area” and “Arat” means “Ploughing” bringing us to the idea of agriculture where the word “Tărîm” means “Land”, while in Turkish the same word “Tarım” means “Agriculture”. In the Vedic culture we have goddess Tara representing the Universal Mother as a personification of the whole earth, while in Romanian we have another word “Țară”, also meaning “Land”.

Prof. Fabio Scialpi: “I am intrigued by the presence on the territory of Rumania, of a number of many toponyms of Sanskrit resonance.”

Since toponymy is the archaeology of language, I shall present some Rumanian toponyms, as well as other toponyms from Europe and Asia:

Rumanian toponyms: Ramna, Râmnicu Vâlcea, Râmnicu Sărat, Râmetea, Rămeţi, Râmeţ, Râmeşti, Armășești, Arămești, Arad, Arieș, Arieșeni, Ardeal, Argeș, Deva, Devesel, Șivița, Șureanu, Vedea, Videle, Vederoasa etc.

European toponyms: Ramułtowice, Rambouillet, Ramhusen, Ramlewo, Ramsowo, Ramvik, Rumia, Ruma, Rumanová, Rumoka, Rumont, Rumejki, Rumelange, Rumes, Rumenka, Rumohr, Rumbach, Rumhult, Rümligen, Rumney, Rümpel, Rumy, Rimpar, Rimogne, Rimsdorf, Rimsberg, Rimforsa, Rimhorn, Rimini, Arklow, Armaillé, Armamar, Armonk, Armau, Armilla, Armissan, Armancourt, Armancy, Armagh, Armadale, Åryd, Armavir, Devičie, Devičany, Devetaki, Vedemö, Vedebylund, Vedebyskolan, Vedeggio, Vedène, Vedeseta, Vedevåg etc.

Asian toponyms: Ramdala, Ramdevra, Ramdurg, Ramaiah, Ramanathapuram, Ramjibanpur, Devaki, Devaliya, Devalapura, Devala, Devapur, Devathur, Devawas, Devikapuram, Suryapet, Suryamal, Suryanagar etc.

Other Rumanian words coming from the root word “Ar”: Arie (Area), Arc (Bow), Arcă (Ark), Arcuș (Fiddlestick), Arcadă (Arcade), Aramă (Copper), Artă (Art), Arhitectură (Architecture), Armă (Weapon), Armură (Armor), Armată (Army), Arat (Ploughing), Arătare (Vision), Arhaic (Archaic), Arhivă (Archive), Argint (Silver), Argat (Plough boy), Arhanghel (Archangel), Armonie (Harmony), Arpă (Harp), Arpegiu (Arpeggio), Artizan (Artisan), Argument (Argument) etc.

Mark Pagel, professor on Evolutionary Biology, Reading University of London: “Over 10.000 years ago, in the Carpathian region there lived a nation who spoke a unique language, precursor to Latin and Sanskrit.”

To further prove the origin of Sanskrit from the Vedic (Rumanian) language I shall give, not just any words as examples, but specifically those which refer to the theosophical aspects of the Vedic culture, including names of deities and various other words (the first word before the “=” sign is in Sanskrit, while the word after the “=” sign is in Rumanian and/or English):

Karma (Action) = Cârmă (steering wheel)

Chakra = Cerc (circle), Disc (disc), Roată (wheel)

Nāḍī (nerve, pulse) = Nod (node, point)

Prāṇa (breath, energy, life) = Hrană (food)

Ākāśa (ether, sky, heaven) = Acasă (home)

Loka (world, place, region, country) = Loc (place, region)

Śāntiḥ (peace, calm, rest, bliss) = Sînt or Sfânt (saint, holy)

Hare (divine energy) = Har (grace)

Indra (leader, prince) – deity from the Vedic pantheon representing the god of rain/thunder, also considered a leader of Devas (masculine) or Devi (feminine) = Îndrea (Rumanian custom), Undrea (December) or Andrea (sowing needle)

Oṃ (Aum – the primordial sound) = Om (human)

Sūrya – solar deity from the Vedic pantheon = Soare (sun)

Agni – deity from the Vedic pantheon representing the god of fire (also the god of divine wisdom) = A igni (to ignite), Agnita (locality from Southwestern Romania)

Vishnu – central deity from the Vedic pantheon = Vișan (Rumanian surname)

Krishna – deity from the Vedic pantheon, representing the 8th avatar (complete) of god Vishnu. His name comes from the Sanskrit ‘Kṛṣṇa’, meaning ‘black’, ‘dark’, ‘dark blue’ = Crișan (Rumanian surname)

Kaliman (black) = Călimani (Rumanian mountains)

[ it has to be mentioned that Rumanians are also called Vlachs, Blachs (Blaki) and in the Rumanian history there is a Wallachian Voivode called Negru Vodă (Black Vodă). Also the river Danube springs from the Black Forest Mountains and it spills into the Black Sea. The black color represents the germinal element, the beginning, but it also represents the fertile land from the “far north” (the cradle of the gods). Romania is notorious for having the best land suited for agriculture and it was once called “the granary of Europe”. Therefore we have tradition, geography, language and history supporting these facts ]

Mitra (sun, friend, ally) = Mitră (cap, mitre), but it also represents Mithra – the solar deity whose name we find in many Rumanian surnames and names such as Mitran, Mitrovan, Mitrache, Mitru, Dumitru, Dumitrache, Dumitrescu, Dimitrie (Demeter) etc.

Aryaman = Companion, Sun

Arat (distance) = Arat (ploughing), Arăt (to point out, to appear)

Arc (brilliant, shining) = Arc (bow)

Divya (divine) = Divin (divine)

Veda (perception) = Vede (to see, also the name for “Vedas” in Rumanian), Văd (to see), Vedere (seeing, sight)

Sarpa (snake) = Șarpe (snake)

Sara (salt) = Sare (salt)

Sat (entity, essence) = Sat (village)

Barbara (barbarian) = Barbar (barbarian)

Maga (magus, priest of the sun) = Mag (magi)

Mandra (enchanting, charming) = Mândră (proud woman, woman)

Masa (mass) = Masă (mass)

Mala (dirt, dust, clay) = Mâl (dirt)

Apa (water) = Apă (water)

Varsa (rain) = Varsă (pour)

Nas (nose) = Nas (nose)

Supa (soup) = Supă (soup)

Sapta (seven) = Șapte (seven)

Zac (to say) = Zâc (to say)

Data (given, cleansed) = Dată (fem. given, date)

Ras (yell, cry, sound) = Râs (laughter)

Rana (fight, conflict, war) = Rană (wound, injury)

Puti (foul-smelling) = Puţi (you stink!)

Pun (heap together) = Pun (put)

Vanati (aim at, attack, injure) = Vânaţi (pl. hunted)

Samantha (kind of culinary herb) = Sămânţă (seed)

Stapana (place) = Stăpână (landlady)

Straina (feminine, female) = Străină (refers to a woman – stranger, foreign feminine object)

Napat (grandchild) = Nepot (nephew)

Pitr (father, ancestor) = Părinte (parent)

Puru (heaven, paradise, man, abundant) / Purana (mythology, old, ancient, legend) / Purusa (man, soul, spirit, supreme being) = Pur (pure, unalloyed, heavenly, absolute, innocent, immaculate, real)

Balarāma (the Vedic god of shepherds and ploughers) = Bălai (blond), Bălan (Rumanian surname, also meaning blond), but there is also a high number of Rumanian toponyms bearing the names Bala, Bălan, Bâlea, Băleni-Români, Bălești, Balotești, Bălușoaia, Băluța, Bălușești, Bălușeni, Balaci, Bălăceanu, Bălănoaia etc.

Anu (atom, soul, life) = Anu or An (year), but in the Emesh mythology it represents the Sky Father

Mūrta (material, substantial, real, embodied) = Moarte (death)

Svarjit (gaining the light, sacrifice) = Sfârșit (end)

Samsara (cycle of worldly existence; «wheel of life») = Samsar (person who intermediates a business, middleman)

Dyumnasah (having power) = Dumneasa (referring to a person as in “him” or “her”), but it really means addressing the godliness within a person since Rumanians call God by the name of “Dumnezeu”, resembling also the name of the Emesh shepherd-deity Dumuzi(d)

‘Om Hrim Sum Suryaya Namaha’ is a mantra which invokes god Sūrya, where ’namah’ is to be translated by ‘na’ and ‘mah’, meaning ‘nu’ and ‘mea’, having the sense of renunciation, respect or adoration, in Rumanian the word “Nu” meaning “No” and “Mea” meaning “Mine”, so we have two elements, one having the sense of negation, while the other having the sense of property.

To demonstrate the Sanskrit resonance of the Rumanian language we shall use just a quick example:

Rumân (Rumanian), mână (hand), a mâna (to lead/to take action), rămâne or rămână (to remain). Where we observe a similar form which suggests that ‘Rumanian’ also means ‘to remain’, meaning something that persists – continuity. Ramana – Indian name. Ram(a) – Deity from the Vedic pantheon, in Rumanian ‘ramură’ or ‘ram’, meaning ‘branch’.

The Romanian scientific researcher Gabriel Gheorghe according to the University of Cambridge (The Cambridge History of India): “In the 5th millennium B.C., the Getic Carpathian space was the only space inhabited in Europe; The Carpathian, Getic or Wallachian space has represented the OFFICINA GENTIUM in antiquity, it has fueled with people and civilization, India, Persia, Greece, Italy, Germany, France and the so called Slavic space; The Vedas, the oldest literary monuments of humanity were created in the center of Europe. The primary phase of the Vedic culture began in the Carpathians, most likely in Ardeal. From Ardeal come the ancestors of Indians, Persians, Albanians, Greeks, who left for Macedonia and Thessaly, the Latins, Celts, Germans and the ancestors of Slavs, who came out through the Moravian defile.”

In a village situated near the banks of the Danube, from Mehedinți County, Romania, the peasants use the following words to call for ducks or piglets:

For ducks: MANI MANI (with repetition). Where ‘Mani’ resembles ‘Manu’, another deity from the Vedic pantheon, but also a Rumanian name, where Manu = Emanuel (E-Manu-El), in translation ‘He is Manu’. In Sanskrit the word ‘Mani’ also means ‘pearl’ or ‘jewel’. But the root ‘MA’, by repetition becomes MAMA, meaning mother.

For piglets: GANI GANI (with repetition). Where ‘Gani’ resembles ‘Ganesh’, another deity from the Vedic pantheon. The root ‘GA’ is another primordial syllable which means ‘earth’ (Gaia). But in the Rumanian folklore ‘Gaia’ is a goddess representing death as a bird of prey which takes the souls of people after they die.

We have another Rumanian saying: “A dat iama în găini.” Meaning “Iama killed the hens.”, where Yama is another deity from the Vedic pantheon (the God of Death).

These repetitions MANI MANI and GANI GANI resemble the Hindu mantras.

Jawaharlal Nehru, ex-Prime Minister of India (Discovery of India, Bucharest, The State Publishing House for Political Literature, 1956, p. 77 and 73): “The Vedas are the operas of Aryans who invaded the rich land of India. It is likely that the inclination towards agriculture to have been prompted by newcomers, by the Aryans who infiltrated India in successive waves, coming from Northwest.”

Analyzing the flora and fauna described in the Vedic texts, the authors of “The Cambridge history of India” (8 volumes, 1922) came to the following conclusions (volume 1, page 68):

– The primitive Aryans who lived in the temperate zone knew species of trees like the oak, the beech, the willow, some species of coniferous trees, the birch, the linden, and probably the elm.

– Probably they were sedentary, because the wheat was familiar to them.

– The most useful animals they knew were the ox and the cow, the sheep, the horse, the dog, the pig, and some species of deer. It seems that in ancient times they didn’t knew the donkey, the camel, and the elephant.

– Among the birds, we can conclude (from the language) that they knew the goose and the duck.

– The most familiar predatory bird was apparently aquila (the hawk).

– The wolf and the bear were known, but not the tiger and the lion.

– Knowing all of this information, we are asking ourselves if is possible to locate the primitive habitat from where the speakers of this languages had their origins.

– It is not likely that the primitive habitat to be India (how the early researchers are assuming), because neither the flora nor the fauna (how they are described in the language) are characteristic to this region. Less likely can be the region of Pamir, one of the most dreadful regions on Earth. It is not likely that Central Asia (considered to be home of the Aryans) could have been played this role, even if we admit that the obvious lack of water (implying the sterility of several areas) can be a more recent phenomenon.

– If indeed these people knew the beech, they must had lived west of a line that started from Königsberg (in Prussia) and was going toward Crimea and from there was continuing through Asia Minor. In the plains of Northern Europe does not exist an area to fulfill all of these conditions. As we know, in ancient times it was a country covered with forests.

– Is there any part of Europe that combines the farming with the shepherding, which are closely related to each other? Is there any part of Europe with warm areas, which are suitable for wheat crops to grow and in the same time with rich grasslands (necessary for the herds to graze on) situated at high altitudes? Is there any part of Europe that is having all of these and in the same time is having trees and birds too, like the ones mentioned above?

– Yes, it is the area in Europe which is bordered at east by the Carpathian Mountains, at south by the Balkans, at west by the Austrian Alps and Böhmerwald Mountains, and at north by Erzgebirge Mountains and the mountains that are making the connection with the Carpathian Mountains (38, p. 68).

About the term ‘Gitia’ representing the land of Getia (Land of God), we have as a reconfirmation of the sacrality of its name, the Vedic opera Bhagavad Gītā (pronounced ‘Geeta’) which means ‘Song of the Lord’ or ‘Divine Song’ that speaks about the noble Aryans (‘Deva’ or ‘Devi’ meaning ‘The Divine’) who invaded the rich land of India. Also we have the terms Deva/Davo/Dava/Daoi/Dioi/Dai/Daos/Danaoi/Dahae | ΔABO ΨETO – DAB(V)O GETO = ‘The Brilliant’ or ‘The Divine’ or ‘The Wolves’, but they also have the meaning of ‘inhabitants of Davas’, where ‘Dava’ = ‘Fortress’. All these terms are in fact epithets which describe the Getes (Dacians). In Sanskrit we have the word „Daksa” meaning „wise”, „smart”, or „earth”. The word „da” means „mountain” or „protection”, while „ksa” means „earth”, „plain”, „thunder”, „peasant” or „destruction” and it is a well-known historic fact that Dacians were a people „clinging to the mountains”, a nation of shepherds and ploughers.

Gordon V. Childe (1926, The Aryans: A Study of Indo-European Origins): “The primary places of Dacians must be searched on the territory of Romania. Indeed, the placing of the main center of formation and expansion of Indo-Europeans must be made at the north and south of the Danube.”

The Vedic language (also known as Pelasgian language, Sermo-Getic language, the corrupt Latin (vulgar), PIE / Pre-Indo-European language, the common „Indo-European” language or „language of the gods”) became – in time – what is today the Rumanian language, having suffered many linguistic enrichments throughout history, just as any other language which takes thousands of years to develop in the natural course of linguistic evolution, yet this language kept its ingenious originality, being itself one of the greatest gifts offered to humanity as far as the history of languages is concerned. This reality was observed by several eminent authorities during history, but unfortunately history is decided by politics and politics is fueled by petty interests, hatred, envy and other malevolent intentions. Whether these facts presented so far will be ever acknowledged or not, I do not know, but I’ve taken the time to demonstrate a linguistic reality which for most Europeans is simply unthinkable. Rumanian language has many other common words with Sanskrit and also with Hindi, with similar or identical form and meaning, but I only presented those words which I considered most important.

I would also like to point out the fact that some authors have striven to show that certain European languages such as Lithuanian, would have been the cradle of the Aryan language, or that Finnish is the oldest European language. How could that be? One can only make such a hasty assertion only if one lacks the knowledge about the most basic aspects with regards to the ancient European civilization. Where were the ancestors of Finns between 12.000 – 7.000 B.C. during the last phases of the final Würm ice age? Were they developing the oldest European culture under glaciers and walls of ice? The answer should be more than obvious. Geography and the harsh conditions of the northern lands could not have supported the development of human life in those times, let alone the absence of salt in those lands which is necessary for the survival of human life, something that you find only in Romania in abundance, where numerous massifs of salt are to be found. As for the Lithuanian language, nobody will contest its connection to the Vedic language, however that is because the ancestors of Lithuanians are descendants of the Old European civilization (The Danubian Civilization) from the Carpatho-Danubian-Pontic space and the Balkans. Surely traces of the Aryan or Vedic language are to be found in most European languages, but that is because native Europeans have something in common and that is their original cradle from which they had migrated towards all corners of Europe. I would also like to remind the fact that the highest concentration of archaeological finds and the oldest European hominids and humans were uncovered in Romania, something too easily ignored unfortunately. Since the oldest cultures of Europe are to be found, for the most part, in the territories of Romania, Moldova, Ukraine, Bulgaria and Serbia (Cucuteni-Trypillia, Turdaş-Vinča, Hamangia, Gumelniţa, Boian, Monteoru, Starčevo-Criș, Vădastra, Lepenski-Vir, Plovdiv, Karanovo etc.), meaning exactly the countries which form the cradle of the oldest European cultures ever known, then how can any of the Nordic languages be considered as primary? These are nothing but sterile assertions and can be easily disqualified by archaeology, anthropology, history, language, folklore, mythology and so on.

I want to make an appeal to all the Jat (Getic) communities of India, as there are thousands and thousands of clans scattered throughout this beautiful ancient land. Rumanians have certainly not forgotten who you are, your heritage and your history, that we share to this very day. You may have forgotten your original homeland from which you migrated thousands of years ago and even if some of you may have changed your religion and your habits, never forget you are Aryans and you are the members of one of the most incredible cultures to have ever existed in the history of mankind. I pray for the day when we will openly discuss this matter and unite our thoughts and hearts in the name of cultural remembrance.

For all those “experts” who use the term „Indo-European” and for those who ridiculously believe that the mother of all Indo-European languages mysteriously vanished from the face of the earth, and also for those who are still searching for this common „Indo-European” language, this is my message to you: Quod erat demonstrandum!


Article A story never told

Article The Carpathian Basin – The Carpathian Space | The Beginning of the European Civilization


The Symbolism of „Raising the Djed Pillar”

[Egypt 29946]ÕRaising the ÒdjedÓ pillar at AbydosÕ.

The Djed (Get) Pillar depicted in the Great Temple of Abydos

The Egyptian pillar named “Djed” is said to be a prehistoric fetish, whose significance was not yet, scientifically, explained until now. It was said that maybe is a stylized imitation of a tree without leaves, or maybe is a pole with notches. Some researchers were considering that the pillar (the column or the Djed pillar) was a simple pole around which were linked ears of grains, circularly and in steps. At the agrarian fertility rituals, this pillar was playing an important role – it was a sign of power through which was preserved the power of the grains. Above all, this pillar has become the symbol of “duration” and this is how was getting into pictograms (icons). Since the times of the Old Kingdom, in Memphis have existed priests of the “venerable Djed”; even the most important god of Memphis, Ptah, was named “the venerable Djed”. Also, in Memphis was taking place the ritual of the “Raising of the Djed Pillar”, ritual which was executed by the King (Pharaoh) with the help of some ropes and the contribution of some priests – symbolic action which was believed it was indicating the length of the royal separation. Once Ptah was identified with Sokaris (the god of necropolis) and once Sokaris was identified with Osiris, starting with the New Kingdom the above mentioned fetish has become the symbol of Osiris. The Djed was interpreted as the “backbone of the god (Osiris)”.

In the place where it was the backbone of the deceased and by identifying the deceased person with Osiris, the sarcophaguses from the New Kingdom were often showing a painted Djed pillar. Outside of the significance given above, the “raising” of the pillar was symbolizing Osiris’s victory over his rival – Seth, the one who put aside the Djed. Being a part of the world of the deceased, the Djed had become an ornament full of meaning. The Djed has on top two eyes – the same as on the princely Getic helmets – sign which can be interpreted as “to see better”.

Geto-Dacian Helmet

Getic Helmet of Coţofeneşti – 4th century B.C. | Romania

Our researchers would have learned more quickly if they would have asked an Egyptian villager to tell them about the significance of the Djed pillar. Because of the translation of the hieroglyphs in a certain way, the initial meaning of its name was distorted. Simplifying everything, we are talking about the Get pole (or Geta column), which is an ancient symbol of the Golden Getae who ruled Egypt at that time. Djed in Croatian language means “very old man” and for Egyptians has the same meaning. The elderly were named Djeti (or Geti/Getae). Because they saved mankind, the Golden Getes were considered the Pillars of the Earth. Around them, new human societies were getting reorganized. The pillar was representing the Tree of Life after the cataclysm, with its skinned branches; sometimes the Sun was placed on top and on its sides were placed the Sun Monkeys, who were playing with the heavenly body in the sky. The four horizontals from the top were representing the four corners of the Earth. The pillar was representing the stability of the Earth and its stillness after so many disasters which had occurred when the seas moved from their places and the mountains raised. The Get (Djed) was the one reorganizing everything on this planet, around this pole. This was the symbol of the cosmic balance of our planet.


The Get Pillar / Axis Mundi / Tree of Life depicted on a ceramic vase belonging to the Danubian Civilization Gârla Mare – Žuto Brdo (Romania & Serbia) | 1.600 – 1.150 B.C.

The Golden Getes, the ancestors of Geto-Dacians, who lived in the half of the 2nd millennium B.C. around the Black Sea (the Getic Sea) are the primordial civilization of the reborn world. All of the other human tribes have started from here. The Golden Getes were before the civilizations of Egypt, Mesopotamia, and other ancient civilizations. These are documented historical truths, recognized by important historians around the world. At that time, the lost world (Poedia) disappeared in proportion of 98%. After the “rebuilding of the world”, the culture of Old Europe had started to resume with the Danube Valley civilization (6.500 B.C., before the existence of Mesopotamia) from Bulgaria, Romania, and Moldavia. After they had rebuilt the primordial human nucleus, those ancient Getes created intercontinental and international routes in order to populate the planet in places like Europe, Asia, Africa, and possibly America. They became so advanced in the science of metallurgy at a point that they could have created melting temperatures of thousands of degrees. They belonged to the same culture, and they have had huge cities. They had the oldest writing in the world, they invented the wheel, and the Yin and Yang symbol was present on those territories 1.000 years before it was discovered in China. They invented the swastika 2.000 years before its apparition into the rest of the world. Important discoveries were made about all of those things and facts, but they were not publicized. Cucuteni culture is the oldest culture in the world and its existence was before the cultures of Egypt and Mesopotamia. Romania is a country with a fantastic archeological heritage. The “horns symbol (bucranium)” appeared here 4.000 B.C. years ago; after this, the symbol was introduced in Egypt and was belonging to the Egyptian pharaohs, who actually were Get gods.

Jennifer Chi, one of the ISAW directors from New York University, said that because of a very large number of exhibits it took her one year and a half in order to make the Cucuteni catalogs from New York. During this time she collaborated with 20 cultural institutions from Romania, among which were the History Museum of Romania in Bucharest, Iaşi History Museum, and Cucuteni Museum in Piatra Neamţ. The exposition amazed the scientific world from over the ocean, who was not aware of this truth which is demolishing all the hypotheses and histories known until now.

The parents of the first Egyptian pharaohs, from the Old Egyptian Kingdom, were Getes. The place of origin of the Egyptian pharaohs was Getia (Arcodabara note: Land of Punt / Pontus Euxinus i.e. Black Sea). The Sun gods, Osiris and Isis, were Getes. In front of the Egyptian temples, the ritual of the raising of the Djed pillar is still practiced – symbolizing the place where the ancient god Osiris, who was assembled from pieces and reborn, had lived. After the last planetary cataclysm, when 98% of humanity died when a “snake” comet “attacked” our planet, the Danubian Knights gathered the rest of humanity around the Getic Sea. The Getes had fed, educated, and prepared them for the recolonization of our ravaged planet. „Get” is an ancient word which is still used by Egyptians, when they are addressing the older people. At the Egyptians, the Gets are named “the great grand-mother” and “the great grand-father”. The story of Osiris (a white man, the Sun god painted in blue – the same with the Dacian Agathyrsi) and his brother Seth (the killer) is actually a Getic story. Seth cut Osiris in pieces and after that he placed him into a coffin and threw the coffin into the ocean. The cosmic cataclysm broke humanity into pieces, a sign of the Universal Flood Val-Hala or the Great Terror. The coffin sailed along the shores of many countries until the sacred tree diverted it with its roots – the Tree of Life, the Djed (Get) pillar which saved all the people who were still alive. The coffin was then found by goddess Isis, Osiris’s sister. Her weeping tears had touched Osiris and in that moment he was brought back to life. They lived together for a while, until they procreated Horus.

The raising of the Getic pillar was representing the stability of all the elements that a normal evolution of the human society was based on; elements like all the four cardinal points, the calendar, the seasons, the position of the stars in the sky, etc. Osiris (OS-IRIS) was inside the Tree Of Life which was teared down by the planetary cataclysm. The story of his life was symbolizing the rebuilding of the god’s body – putting an order in everything (OS means “the strong”) and carefully supervising the balance of things (IRIS means “the all seeing eye”). Being inspired by the Djed symbol, Emperor Trajan, who after two wars with the Dacians had found the meaning and purpose of the Getic school and philosophy, ordered the building of the Trajan’s Column in Rome, in 113 A.D. This column is a Djed pillar, a genuine Getic column. The statue of the Emperor placed on top of the column, attributed him the role of god (Osiris) who was watching over his country, the Roman Empire. By placing the urn ashes at the base of the column, was ensured his permanent presence into the “verticality” of the Imperial balance beyond death. Being one of the most impressive triumphal monuments which was ever built, Trajan’s Column is one of the most complete works carved in marble left to us by antiquity. The column is a prolific source of study for historians, archeologists, and artists from all over the world. Trajan’s Column is one of the most famous monuments in Rome. Being inspired by the one who understood the history of the Golden Getes and built this column in his Imperial Forum along with hundreds of statues of Dacians, other emperors had built Getic Columns (or Djed pillars) too , as following: in 161 A.D. was built in Rome the Column of Antoninus Pius and after this, in 193 A.D., was built the Column of Marcus Aurelius (with scenes from the Roman-Dacian and Germanic wars); between 268 A.D. – 337 A.D. was built in Constantinople the Column of the Goths (or Getes) ; between 296 A.D. – 305 A.D. was built in Alexandria, Egypt, the Column of Pompeii ; in 330 A.D. was built in Constantinople the Column of Constantine; between 379 A.D. – 395 A.D. was built from an Egyptian obelisk of Thutmosis III, which was brought from Karnak, the Column of Theodosius from Constantinople; between 337 A.D. – 365 A.D., during the reign of Constantinus II, another obelisk was brought from Egypt and was placed in Piazza di S. Giovanni, in Laterno, Rome; the Column of Arcadius was built in 401 A.D., in Constantinople; between 450 A.D. – 457 A.D. was built in Constantinople the Column of Marcianus; between 543 A.D. – 545 A.D. was built in Constantinople the Column of Istinianus, which was destroyed by Ottomans in 1515; in 608 A.D. was built in Rome the Column of Phoca; in 1015 was built in Hildesheim, Germany, The Column of Saint Bernward; in 1574 was build in Paris, France, the Column of Medicis; between 1671 – 1677 was built in London, England, the Monument of the Great Fire; between 1716 – 1737 were built in Vienna, Austria, two columns of the Karlskirche Church; in 1790 was built in Nantes, France, the Column of Louis XVI; between 1791 – 1792 was built in Essonne, France, the Column of Trajan of Méréville; between 1804 – 1823 was built in Pas-de-Calais, France, the Column of the Grande Armée (or the Column of Napoleon’s Army); in 1809 was built in Montreal, Canada, Nelson’s Column; in 1810 was built in Paris, France, Vendôme Column; between 1830 – 1834 was built in Petrograd, Russia, the Column of Alexander; between 1830 – 1834 was built in London, England, Duke of York Column; between 1835 – 1840 was built in Paris, France, “de Juillet” Column; between 1840 – 1843 was built in London, England, Nelson’s Column; between 1850 – 1859 was built in Brusells, Belgium, Congress Column; and in 1926 was built in Oregon, USA, Astoria Column.


Egyptian Obelisk | Karnak Temple Complex

Besides all of these columns, we have the Egyptian obelisks including the ones which were moved, out of Egypt, to other countries. In Rome we have eight Egyptian obelisks, in Italy we have eleven, in France (Paris) we have one, in England we have four, in Germany we have one, in Turkey we have one, in USA (New York) we have one, and in Israel we have one. Also, there were built other modern obelisks like Washington Monument Obelisk in Washington D.C., USA, and Braunschweig Obelisk and Erfurt Obelisk, both of them in Germany. In Romania different monuments of the fallen heroes were built in an obelisk shape form. The Column of Infinity belonging to the great sculptor Constantin Brâncuşi is also a Getic column. All of those columns represented the cosmic stability of the planet.


The Infinity Column (Endless Column) | Târgu-Jiu / Romania

The buildings with a religious character had in their architectural composition at least one such pillar. This was the tower belfry (“T” – the one who keeps the sky, the one who is howling, the tower of the messenger).

As a personified emblem symbol we have the Ankh (the cross of the sky which can be hung in the sky, by its handle). When the AN-KH is not fixed is representing the miserable time when from the skies is raining with hydrocarbons (at this aspect was referring when Egypt was named “the black Earth”. The mummies were dressed in bitumen for the same reason). Also another personified emblem symbol is the Djed pillar, the royal scepter. The Djed appeared first, in the Pre-dynastic period, on the label-cartridges of the king Narmer and had continued to be used throughout the whole history of Egypt. Usually the coat of arms and the emblems accompanied the king everywhere. For example the image of Ramses’s III tomb has a Djed pillar, and is showing the king holding in his hands two maces which are symbolizing the dominion. The same image is also showing the “ankhs” (symbolizing the Egyptian cross) hanging from his arms (symbolizing a sign of balance). We can also find this complex image on a NEB basket, representing the sign of “togetherness” or “the Lord”. The translation of the cryptogram is, as following: “All the dominion and life are reflected in how the stability is approached” (for example Ramses, who became Osiris – assuming himself the role of a leader).

For us, Romanians, the image of the pole (pillar) was introduced at religious funerals and rituals. The pole is placed at the head of the deceased person and after that “the poles are read”. On the Geto-Dacian lead plates from Sinaia you can see an image similar with those in Egypt, but with two heavenly columns between which is placed the leader (or the god).

Since ancient times our people and their wooden work art civilization, have started to build triptychs. As a sign of “Trojan” (big tidal wave which led to a planetary disaster), the name was perpetuated into the names of other things like Troy Fortress (Troesmis, or Trosmis) – which was a Getic fortress located in Tulcea County. Also, from here probably has derived “Tomis” name. The name was perpetuated into the triptychs name (the ropes of the Trojan, IŢE = ropes). In our country, where is a crossroad, is always a triptych (a Troy). The big number of triptychs, which are find on the roadsides of our villages, is showing the great importance Romanian people are giving to them. The Romanian villager, the creator and protector of our spiritual identity, is the one who kept into our conscience the sign and the significance of this perennial element and ancestral message. The places where those triptychs are placed, are very important for the messages they want to convey. So we can find them into the heart of Romanian villages (conveying a sign of stability and balance), at the crossroads (conveying a sign of balance and luck), at the well waters (conveying a sign of life), at the borders of villages, or at the bridgeheads. In the past, in the middle of settlements were built Pillars of Heaven (the T-shape are the ones on which the sky is leaning and not falling on Earth) as a sign of communication with divinity, providing the much needed balance. When in trouble, the Romanians are saying “The sky fell on my head”. If we would knew that this was even possible in the previous ages, when the sky came down so much that we could have touched it, we would have looked with other eyes at the signs our ancestors left for us. The “wheel” of our planet had turned, knocking off stability. The triptych has many arms. It does not have just three arms, as we may believe if we are looking at the name. There are triptychs with four planetary horizon signs, the same as with the Egyptian Getic pillar. Having the image of our Lord painted on the triptych, He is invested with the task of saving the world and keeping the world in balance. Also, He is invested with the task of being a leader – the shepherd. The triptychs are an extension of the menhirs (Men-hir = here is the man, the one who is sustaining the Earth and the Heavens) found on the Gods’ Road, in Bessarabia.

In Maramureş is predominant the cross- triptych, which is placed into a circle and is made from stone or wood (the “Wallachian Wheel”, the rolling sign of our planet – the Old Egyptian Wallachian Church). On the iconography of the Romanian triptychs we have scenes of Jesus’s life, the Holy Trinity, the Virgin Mary, or we have images of the saints who are patronizing the founder. Also, are frequently represented the Gabriel and Michael archangels, the four evangelists, St. George, St. Demetrius, Saints Constantine and Helena, St. Elias, St. Katherine, St. Paraschiva, St. Filofteia, biblical scenes, and portraits of the founders. One of the details which is getting the attention when it comes to the Romanian triptychs, is that they are reflecting the Christian teachings in a specific Romanian way – integrating into those teachings local autochthonous folkloric visions about life and the world. Some of the triptychs have a resemblance with the image of the Tree of Life, and Adam and Eve dressed in folk garments are placed at the bottom of the triptych (at the base of human life). Eve is illustrated as spinning and Adam is illustrated as plowing or digging the soil. It is believed that we are talking about a naïve assimilation of some celestial elements, but if the Turks had said that this is “the land of Adam” (Adam Clisi) and Pope John Paul II has said that “here is the garden of Virgin Mary”, where else could Adam and Eve have been appeared repopulating the planet? Not here, in the heart of Old Europe? Everything can be explained by the fact that for us, Romanians, the spiritual world has a humanized outward aspect and God is perceived as existing inside of you – inside the human being. We do not have a God who is cold and careless, we have a God who is sitting with people at the table and people are addressing Him with “God, sweetheart”. Wherever they are placed, the signs of the Getic (Djed) Pillar are bringing harmony and balance; but more than anywhere else, those signs are “at home” in our Romanian land of the Golden Getes.

Arcodabara note:

The name of Tomis (Constanţa) actually comes from queen Tomyris of the Massagetae who founded the fortress. She was also famous for defeating and beheading Cyrus the Great.

Article written by George V. Grigore | Simbolistica înălţării Pilonului Get (Djed)

Translated by Ioana A.

The Carpathians | The „Salt Shaker” of Europe


Salt Mountain in Slănic – Prahova County | Romania

According to Nietzsche “the human intellect has produced in immense periods of time only errors”.

Why is necessary that every era to write its own history?

While the positive science is enhancing the knowledge of the world, we can have a more clear picture of the past developments, and therefore we can have clearer visions which are coming closer to the truth.

But, what is the truth really?

It is a specific way of theoretical, technical and practical understanding, by humans, of life and universe.

This understanding was not always the same – the atoms of Democritus have represented one way of understanding reality; the contemporary ones, were representing another way of understanding the same reality. So, the reality has not changed, but our understanding. As time has passed, since Democritus’s times and until today’s days, we have not gone through a sudden understanding; but through a slow and gradual one, with the diverse historical periods having specific agreements – which means that humanity is moving asymptomatically in rapport with the truth and the surrounding reality.

The same thing has happened with the thunder, the lightning, the rain, the snow, and with many aspects from the natural environment – for which the understanding and explanations have varied over time.

So, from these few considerations we can conclude that every era is carrying her own truths.

The history written in the Middle Ages and up to the 19th century, despite its claims of being science, sometimes did not meant more than science-fiction stories.

When the famous Max Müller, in the middle of the last century, had discovered a primary cradle of the Aryans (farmers and herdsmen) on the highest plateau of Asia (at an altitude of over 4,500 meters where the soil is getting defrosted only two weeks per year), this has not prompted any reaction from his contemporary scholars peers.

But let’s quote Max Müller, directly:

“Il existait un petit clan d’Aryas établis probablement SUR LE PLUS HAUT PLATEAU DE L’ASIE CENTRALE (subl. ns.) et parlant un language qui n’était encore ni le sanscrit, ni le grec, ni l’allemand, mais qui contenait les germes de tous cesdialectes. Ces Aryas étaient AGRICULTEURS (subl. ns.) et étaient déjŕ parvenus ŕ un certain degré de civilisation.” (3, p. 269)

“There is a small group of Aryans, settled on the highest plateau of Central Asia, who were speaking a language which was not yet Sanskrit, Greek , or German – but which contained in its seeds all these dialects. These Aryans were farmers who had already reached a certain degree of civilization.”

His countryman, Isaac Taylor, toward the end of the century is saying about discoveries like this that “Il n’y a pas de plus curieux exemple des aberrations de la science” (2, p. 173) which means – “does not exist a more curious example of science aberrations, like this one”.

Unfortunately, we have found many such fundamental errors written and spread by some illustrious scholars; but this is not the place to mention them.

Isaac Taylor is quoting several such names, as following:

“Il est instructif de voir combien sont médiocres les arguments qui suffirent ŕ convaincre les plus grands érudits de l’Allemagne et de l’Angleterre Pott, Lassen, Grimm, Schleicher, Mommsen et Max Müller que les Aryens étaient originaires de l’Asie, d’oů, par migrations successives, ils étaient venus s’établir en Occident… cette opinion, quoique peu fondée, fut universellement acceptée…” (2, p. 16)

“It is instructive to see how mediocre are the arguments which are stealing enough in order to convince the greatest scholars of Germany and England like Pott, Lassen, Grimm, Schleicher, Mommsen and Max Müller that the Aryans were originally from Asia, from where through successive migrations came to Occident. Although this opinion was very less developed, was universally accepted.”

Another error, which is not less important, is the made-up name of “Goths” by the medieval historiography. Actually “Goths”, undoubtedly represents another name for Gets (or Getians).

This evidence will be given in an introductory study, of a bilingual Latin/Romanian history of the Getians written by Jordanes in 551 A.D., whose original title is “De origine actibusque Getarum” – which means “About the origins and deeds of the Getians”. In this study, many historians have seen an imaginary confusion of Jordanes (himself being a Get) between the so called “Goths” and Gets.

If the savants we have reminded, and many others, would had taken Mother Nature as a guide, they would not had wasted their lives without any use.

The environmental conditions, the ones which have sustained the preservation of human life and the animals which have supported humans’ existence, were the first ones to be identified. If they would have done this, these illustrious scholars would not have to search at thousands of kilometers away in Central Asia, because it would have been enough to look closer in the center of Europe, in the Carpathian Space – the European Canaan, how Tröster named Transylvania.


Salt Mountain in Lopătari – Buzău County | Romania

In the “History of Transylvania”, an anonymous compendium from the Vatican library, in a Latin manuscript 6263 (approx. 1530), between pages 204 – 253 is written: “The principality is more than happy and more than any other, is fertile for everything …. here they have lived extraordinarily easily.”

The same way are reporting many other eyewitnesses, like Paul Strassburg (1632), Evliya Çelebi, Marigli , Petrus and Manutius Paulo (1596) , Johann Filstich (1728) and so on. Let’s partially quote Erasmus von H. S. Weismantel (1688-1749) who was saying that “this country has the most wonderful and rich land….with a little work it produces the most beautiful and best grains, vegetables, and other things.”

It is very curious how the Magyar historiography from the last century had sustained the hypothesis that Transylvania (together with the extra-Carpathian areas) – which in the preceding millennia has formed the only area in Europe where the full necessary conditions for the conception, preservation and perfection of human life were being present – has been inhabitable for 1,000 years, before the Hungarians had arrived from Central Asia, in order to populate it.

This historiography is ridiculed by clear aspects from geology and physiology, which are impossible to be challenged and questioned.

Figure no. 1 shows the illustrative findings of the research, conducted under the auspices of University of California in Los Angeles (UCLA), made by Marija Gimbutas – archaeology professor at this university.

Old Europe

Fig. 1 – The Old European civilization, during the peak of its expansion – 5th millennium B.C., as the part of the ancient world.

The object of prof. M. Gimbutas’s investigation was the archaeological remains from the Neolithic period (6,000 – 2,700 B.C.E). The traces of human inhabitation and the objects discovered during the archaeological excavations, can be found in museums and special places in all countries.

In the 5th millennium B.C. (as can be seen in fig. 1 – 5, pg. 54), with the exception of the Carpathian and peri-Carpathian space, Europe was a huge white spot. This reality is supported by the absence of skeletons from the Neolithic period, in countries which today are being known as France, England, Germany, etc.

At the end of her research, M. Gimbutas was writing (5. pg. 55 – Romanian edition), as following: “It is unclear what has caused the initial impulse for the cultural development of this ancient European civilization.”

A legitimate question would be: “Why in the Carpathian space has been appeared an organized human society and has been developed a primary grandiose civilization, and in other parts of Europe nothing like this has happened?”

The number of scholars like Mommsen, Virchow, Clémence Royer, André Lefčvre, André Piganiol, Pierre Lévêque, etc – who wrote about this difference, is very high; but, they could not find the explanation for it.

For some the physiology has not been born, and for others has not reached the perfection – yet.

We have published (6, pg. 49) a bilingual Romanian/English article named “The salt, a criteria for rethinking history”; article in which based on the data provided by physiology, we have concluded that without salt human life cannot exist.

Le sel est absolument indispensable ŕ la vie physiologique de l’homme… (7, p. 5)

The salt is absolutely vital for the physiological life of humans.

Without knowing about sodium and potassium, the villagers from ancient times knew that without salt life cannot exist.

Only like this can be explained the text 5/13 of Matthew, which is saying “You are the salt of the Earth”. In the story “The goat with her three offspring” she is bringing on her back a block of salt in order to give it to them, and in the story “The salt in the dishes” the moral is – without honey and sugar humans can live, but without salt – no..

Knowing the importance of salt while they were being simple villagers, these historians and linguists have forgotten about it – after they have gone to universities.

But let’s quote in the context two American references:

a. Without salt, the body goes into convulsions, paralysis, and death (9, p. 381).

b. Over many generations, only those humans survived who could carefully conserve enough sodium for good health. The rest have perished (10, p. 136).

Long before the article we have mentioned, we have written about the physiology of nutrition for an encyclopedia of culinary arts. With this occasion we have entrusted the overwhelming role of the 15-16 trace elements, the oligo-elements (oligo = a little bit), which although they are found in very small quantities in the human body, they are indispensable to achieve the vital functions of the body.

Sodium and potassium, through their role in producing the neuromuscular excitation of all muscles, are involved in achieving and maintaining the tone of the heart muscle, in keeping the acid-base balance in place, in achieving the intra-organic osmotic pressure, etc.

The conclusion is – despite the fact that sodium and potassium do not represent more than 0,5% – 0,6% from the whole body weight, for example a body of 70 kilograms contains 245 grams of Ka and 105 grams of Na, without them human life is not possible.

In the table 2.7, from the book we have mentioned, we can see very easily that in milk and products of milk, the quantities of potassium are two up to three times more than the ones of sodium. In meat and the products of meat, the same ratio is 1/2 to 1/4 – 1/5 in the favor of potassium. Almost the same ratio can also be find in fish and other aquatic animals. In cereals, fruits and vegetables the disproportion between sodium and potassium is very big – the ratio being 1/10 sodium to potassium, and in some cases the difference is 1/100 – 1/200 sodium to potassium.

The conclusion is that the quantity of potassium can be obtained from food, while the sodium cannot be obtained through diet.

Without an alternative to this limit situation, all the mammals including humans could have been disappeared. The alternative is represented by the rock salts deposits. The richest continent with salt resources is Europe, followed by North America. The most disadvantaged continents in salt resources are Asia, Africa and South America.

Romania is the most favored area in the world regarding the quantity of salt, quality of salt, and the presence of many massifs of salt on the soil surface (see Fig. 2).


Fig. 2 – Meledic Saline Plateau (Salt Mountain) – Buzău County | Romania

As a corollary of human physiology, human life could not have been appeared except only in an area with sodium resources in place. In Europe the only area like this was the Carpathian cradle of the European civilization.

Since Neolithic times in the backyard of every villager was a boulder of salt, which the cow and the sheep have been licking it, when they came home from grazing – getting the sodium necessary for their bodies. When they were leaving for transhumance with their herds of sheep, the Carpathian shepherds were carrying with them, on donkeys, sufficient quantities of salt which helped them and their animals to get their sodium needs, until spring – when they were returning back home, in the Carpathian mountains; Carpathian space which was the only source of salt in the whole peri-Carpathian area.

We want to get your attention on a very important subject for the history of Europe, subject which has not been mentioned yet- there have been existed shelters of the Wallachian shepherds in the area of Northern Black Sea up to the Caucasus, in the Balkan Peninsula up to the Aegean Sea and Marmara Sea, and in Illyria and Pannonia up to the Adriatic sea; places from where during the spring time, the herds were coming back home in the Carpathian space. In all of these extra-Carpathian spaces there is no salt, and this is why during autumn, when the shepherds were leaving in transhumance with their herds of animals, they were taking with them the so needed salt until they were coming back in the Carpathian space – the “salt shaker” of Europe.

It could not have been possible a reverse transhumance, with the shepherds coming out from these extra-Carpathian spaces and going toward the Carpathian spaces. Before the road salts have been constructed, in order to supply the people with the necessary salt, the humans and animals could not have been survived in these areas.

The sheep was domesticated in the Carpathian space 10,000 years ago, since Mesolithic times, from where it has been spread through periodic oscillations.

In a temperate zone, the minimum requirement of salt is 1 gram per day for children under one year old, 10 grams per day for children between 1 and 14 years old, 25 grams per day for adults who are doing easy work, and 35 grams per day for adults who are doing hard work. The average consumption of salt is varying from country to country. The average quantity of the consumption of salt is 7.5 kilograms per person per year.

The consumption of salt recommended for animals is 10-30 grams per day for cows, 7-15 grams per day for sheep, 5-10 grams per day for pigs, etc.

The percentages of salt used in the food industry, are as following: between 2% – 2.5% salt used in butter and margarine, between 1.75% – 3.25% salt used in cheese, between 1.5% – 2% salt used in canned vegetables, between 3% – 20% salt used in pickled vegetables, between 2% – 6% salt used in prepackaged meats and corned beef, between 10% – 30% salt used for the conservation of fish, etc.

From the numbers mentioned above, we can conclude that for the existence of any human group, large amounts of salt are necessary.

Also, should be noted that until the invention of refrigerators, large amounts of salt were used in order to preserve food.

On page 7, in an interview published in Magazine no. 33 (August 13, 1983), the Romanian anthropologist Dr. Dardu Nicolăescu Plopşor is saying that “Salt has always been used in food, by humans. According to some scientists, an indirect proof of this assumption is that the oldest human settlements can be found usually in valleys and ONLY IN THE NEAREST VICINITY OF SOME MASSIFS OF SALT.”

What Dr. Dardu Nicolăescu Plopşor is saying, regarding the human settlements from the Carpathian Mountains, agrees with what Herodotus (5th century B.C.) is saying in his “Book IV § CLXXXI – CLXXXV” – where he is talking about diverse populations who are living next to a hill of salt and a water spring.

In the above mentioned interview, Dardu Plopşor is also saying that “Such findings have prompted some researchers to advance the idea that the consumption of salt has played an important role in the process of evolution from hominids into humans.”

In the 4th millennium B.C., between the Neolithic settlements (belonging to the Cucuteni culture) from Ţolici and Târpeşti, in the Ţolici forest, have been discovered some salt water springs – which have been known and used since Pre-Cucuteni III. Similar discoveries have been made in other areas belonging to the Cucuteni culture, and also in areas belonging to the Criş culture (5,500 B.C.). For sources see “Getica” magazine 1-2/1992, pg. 56. So it should not be surprising that the oldest material traces dating 1,800,000 – 2,000,000 years in the past, like the shaft of tibia and femur belonging to a hominid, have been discovered by the Romanian anthropologists Constantin and Dardu Nicolăescu-Plopşor – in the Carpathian space on the shores of the Getic Lake, on the territory of Bugiuleşti commune (Vâlcea County), in a place called Grăunceanu Valley.

Being made public and attested at various international congresses, these discoveries could represent the first Australopithecus “resort” found on the European continent – the oldest vestiges of human settlements, belonging to the earliest stages of human history from Pre-Paleolithic times.

Human life has appeared only in an area where salt was present, and the Carpathian space is such a privileged place.

From all the places in the world, the Carpathian space enjoys the highest density of salt resources. We can find here over 300 massifs of salt of high quality, which are easy to exploit, and some of them can be find even on the surface of the soil in the form of salt mountains. Besides these 300 massifs of salt, which are located on both sides of the Carpathian Mountains, in the Romanian space we can find 3,000 salty water springs (Dr. I. P. Voiteşti, 1920) and numerous salt lakes like Amara, Razelm, The Salty Lake, etc. Our mother told us that after World War I, in Pietricica commune (Bacău County), they were getting salty water for cooking food, out of a water well.


Salt Mountain in Praid-Sovata (Harghita & Mureş Counties) | Romania

Starting with the 6th millennium B.C. there is a demographic explosion of the population, so the people had to spread and live in areas lacking salt resources.

The physiological dependency on salt, has made the spread of populations to be conditioned by the continuous supply with salt of the people living in these areas. This is how salt roads have been developed, which are starting from the Carpathian space and going out in all directions – south, west, north, east. Along these roads have been appeared new human settlements, which were located increasingly distant from the resources of salt. One such road starting from Slănic saline, was passing through Bucharest (where we already have a road named “The Salt Road”), and after that was crossing the Danube reaching Bosphorus.

The transportation of salt on such long distances was not missed by dangers, and the risks taken had to be paid. This is why salt had become so expensive to the point that in some areas was reaching currency exchange status. From this situation has been born the expression “to be too salty” which means “to be too pricey” – when we are referring to the pricing of goods. We also have the expression “if salt is spilled, we are going into a brawl”, expression which is justified by the scarcity and the high prices of salt.

Being a high priced product, salt was used, in some areas, like a gift brought to the shrines of various deities. As the people were moving away from the natural resources of salt, a prosperous trade with salt was being born. The role of salt in history was crucial – Venice has developed because of the salt trade and has waged wars in order not to lose the salt trade monopoly, and London and Hamburg have developed in connection with the salt trade.

Dardu Plopşor was saying that at the Gets the salt was considered to have mythical and magical qualities, and the so called Dacian fruit-bowls were nothing else than salt containers used in rituals. Regarding the mythical qualities of salt, J. J. Ehrler (13. p. 46) is writing, as following: “The Romanian oath is made on BREAD, WATER and SALT; it is known that once the Romanians are swearing on these things, they would rather endure torture and give their lives than to betray their accomplices, as happened on several occasions.” It is a sacred oath!

According to Ion Ghinoiu, in a speech presented on June 19, 1993, at S.C. GETICA, in “Căluş” – a prehistoric ritual attested only in Romania, which is representing a millenary tradition about a zoomorphic deity, the HORSE – in the Sacred Circle are being put, in order to be enchanted by the Căluş, only Romanian food symbols. These food symbols are represented by a small block of SALT and some seeds, which are coming only from plants growing since ancient times in the Carpathian space like wheat, millet, barley, oats, and rye. Among these food symbols, corn was never used.

The magical aspect is very widespread – salt is used in different spells and talismans in order to cure different diseases (14, p. 19, 84, 202, 245, 247, 376, 384, 388, 393). Also, in Romania the guests were and are being welcomed with bread and salt – as a sign of friendship and hospitality.

According to Schiller, two forces are driving the world – hunger and love. Hunger was the human being condition of existence, love was the condition of existence of the species in itself. In order for the species to exist, is necessary that the people who are forming it to secure their own individual existence first. This is why nutrition is an existential constant which is governing, from birth to the grave, the individual life of humans. Until the apparition of the so called consumerism society, nothing was done without sense in the first moments of humanity’s existence, and after that throughout all its evolution. Since the beginning, the human being has depended on nature and has collaborated with it in a natural process, and its existence was developing under the motivation of necessity.

Today, many European nations (we are referring to the ones who left us mentions in this regard) like the Spanish, the French, the English, the Danish, the Scandinavians are claiming their Carpathian origins. For the ones from whom we do not have such a direct claiming, we still have the various historical documents. So the whole scenario of the development of human evolution, has its roots coming from the more favorable conditions offered by the Carpathian space; one of these conditions being that this space has represented for millennia the “salt shaker of Europe”.

Article written by Gabriel Gheorghe | Carpaţii – „Solniţa” Europei

Translated by Ioana


1. Zaborowski, M. S., “Les peuples Aryens d’Asie et d’Europe”, Paris, Octave Doin, 1908, 439 p.

2. Taylor, Isaac, “L’origine des Aryens” … (Traduction de l’anglais), Paris, Vigot Frčres, 1895, 332 p.

3. Müller, Max, “La science du langage”, Paris, A. Durand et Pedone Lauriel, 1867, 530 p.

4. Weismantel (von) Erasmus A. S., “A short description of the Moldavian territories”, ap. “Foreign travelers about the Romanian lands”, vol. VIII, ESE, 1983

5. Gimbutas, Marija, “Culture and civilization”, Meridiane publishing house, 1989, 296 p.

6. “GETICA” magazine, nr. 1-2/1992

7. Stocker, Jean, “Le sel”, Paris, PUF, 1949

8. Mollat, Michel (Edit.), “Le rôle du sel dans l’histoire”, Paris, PUF, 1968, 334 p.

9. Young, Gordon, “Salt, the essence of life”, In: “National Geographic”, September 1977, vol. 152, nr. 3.

10. Adams, Ruth and Murray, Frank, “Minerals, kill or cure?” N. Y. Larchmont Books, 1977, 370 p.

11. Gheorghe, Gabriel, “Culinary art. Small practical encyclopedia”, Ceres publishing house, 1982, 464 p.

12. Atudorei, C. et al, “The research, exploitation, and valorification of salt”, Tehnică publishing house, 1971, 396 p.

13. Ehrler, J. J., “The Banat region, from origins until now – 1774”, Timişoara, Facla publishing house, 1982, 208 p.

14. Candrea, I. A., “The Romanian medical folklore”, Casa publishing house, 1944, 478 p.

The Kabyles | Amazigh


Kabyle women wearing specific garments and adornments (click on the picture to read the full study)

In North and Northwestern Africa, on the west side of the Nile River, live the “Berbers”, as the Arabs call them, or Kabyle, Imazighen (singular: Amazigh), Imazyen or Tamazight, as they call themselves; they number approximately 23 million people, residing in enclaves scattered throughout Libya, Algeria, Morocco, Mauritania, Niger, Mali and Tunisia. They consider themselves to be the native people on those lands who converted to Islam in the VII century, after having practiced both Judeo-Christianity and the Ariminic Christianity for over 200 years. These people, strongly Islamized and Arabized, present a significant peculiarity: anthropologically speaking, they are connected to the populations inhabiting the Central and Eastern Europe; however, no one made time to study them and wonder why most of the Berbers resemble the populations we previously mentioned and why some of the clothes they wear have elements also encountered in the Romanian folk costumes and in the traditional clothing of the Tohari people living in the Asian part of Russia. Seeing that their history directly concerns us, I will begin rummaging through the dust of time to find the traces of the lost steps and of the calls to remembrance.

An Emesh hymn says that Enki, meaning Mother Earth, gave her son Inzak or Imzag dominion over the entire country of Dilmun. The land of Dilmun is the territory situated to the north and south of the Danube, where we can find the oldest traces of civilization and the ancient stronghold of Dimum, dating from the 4th millennium B.C. These populations were the first to use writing. The Emesh (or Sumerians as the lying rascals called them) began their migration from the Carpathian region, a historical truth which can be proved not only by the 2.982 words in the ancient Romanian, similar with the Eme-gi dialect and other 4.405 Romanian words composed of two or more phonemes, but also by the information provided by the lead plates discovered in Sinaia. Perhaps Imzag in the Emesh myth is Pelasgus or Atlas in the mythology of these lands made known through the ancient Greek writings. A semantic analysis of the word Imazighen or Imazyen reveals a piece of the true history of our people, so terribly oppressed by fate; ima: fertile earth, crowd + zig: to be thrown out, to break off, to uproot oneself, to last, sky, tall, strong + en: land, country, ancestor. Or, in the second case, ima + zyen: deity of the moon and resurrection in the Emesh and Getic mythology, also written as Zuen, Zoen, Zoin – direct reference to the legend of humankind born from Maia, daughter of the Titan Atlas, who lived in the skies together with her six other sisters. The term ,,amazigh” decomposes into ama: mother, ox + zig: to be thrown out, to break off, to uproot oneself, to last, sky, tall, strong, also alluding to a people descended from the gods through the solar bull as a totem of the first people on Earth. The word Imazighen (in Tifinagh writing: Imaziγen) is the plural form of Amaziğ, which according to the medieval scholars Ibn Hazm and Ibn Haldun would mean “father”, “leader” or “freeman”. We know a Greek version of this myth which says that Uranus, the creator of the world (Ur: origin, soul, heart, being, foundation + Anu: God) gave his son Atlas dominion over the lands situated north of the Danube and meant as eternal halidom for the People Descended from the Gods; from Atlas, this country blessed by the Heavenly Father, came to the Hyperborean or Pelasgian Japheth.

The clay plates discovered in the lands where in ancient times lived the Emesh/Sumerians, say that on the island we call today Failaka, situated east of Kuwait, there used to be a temple sacred to Imzag of Dilmun and the merchants paid homage to this deity when they returned with silver from the faraway country of Dilmun, where a round trip took two years. In the same temple they also paid homage to the goddess Nigal of Ur. To the mythological information transmitted from Antiquity, I will add below a few historical data that nobody truly understood so far.

The ancient Greeks left us a story about the legendary king Danaos or Danaus, assumed to have ruled in Argos, Peloponnese, in the beginnings of their civilization. They also tell us that this king was born in Lybia – a country that was once controlled by the famous Gaetuli – and he had a brother called Aegyptos; after the death of their father Belos, who also ruled over the lands from beyond the Nile River, the kingdom was divided between the two sons: Danaus received Lybia and Aegyptos received the land of the Nile, which he named after him. Aegyptos had fifty sons, whereas Danaos had fifty daughters and Aegyptos asked his brother to marry their children, in order to restore the old kingdom of their father. However, Danaos, suspecting that his brother had evil thoughts, put his entire kin and luggage into ships and set sail in secret to Peloponnese, where his uncle had built the stronghold of Argos, and he became king of these places due to the predictions of an oracle. During his reign, king Danaos or Danaus issued a law to change the name of the “Danaans” (meaning those he had brought with him) into Pelasgians, same as his uncle’s people and the ancient people who had built the stronghold. After Danaos’s death, the throne passed again to Gelanor, also called the Pelasgian, the former king. There are other myths which also say that the Danaans were Pelasgians, meaning the same people, but they were related to the ancient Egyptians. We encounter the same information written several times in the Torah, saying that the Philistines were brothers of the ancient Egyptians and that the Egyptians colonized Macedonia, led by the “brave” Macedo, covered in a wolf hide; his name also gave the name of the country. However, in Canaan there was the stronghold of Macedo, also known under the name of Megiddo.

In the work Description of Greece II, 19, the author Pausanias who lived during the 2nd century A.D., writes that after the death of king Danaos, the throne passed to Pelasgos, without mentioning if he was Gelanor or if this was actually the name of the new king. About these legendary facts we also have the testimony of the writer Ctesias who lived in the 5th century B.C. Ctesias tells us that a king of the Scythians (meaning of the Getae, because the Greeks called all those who lived north of the Ister Scythians) defeated the Egyptian pir-o (pharaoh) Sesostris on his own lands, retreating afterwards to his homeland.

In his work Philippic Histories, the Latin writer Trogus Pompeius, who lived in the 1st century B.C., left us a testimony that king Tanausis of the Getae (meaning the Getae who lived north of the Ister) defeated the Egyptian king Vesosis on the banks of the river Phasis (possibly a branch of the Nile River flowing into the Delta). Furthermore, the Greek historian Philo of Byblos, who lived in the 1st century A.D., wrote that the Egyptian pharaoh Sesostris came with a large army north of the Ister to subdue by sword the Getae king Tanausis or Danaus. The author says that he took this information from Sanchuniathon’s Phoenician history, written in the 12th century B.C., which he translated into Greek. Valerius Flaccus, another Latin writer who lived in the 1st century A.D., writes in Argonautica: “Sesostris was the first king to wage war upon the Getae, but terrified by the slaughter of his army, he withdrew fast to Thebes, on the banks of the Nile, accompanied by only a few of his people”, meaning that all their bravery had turned into a terrible defeat.

Click here to read the full study.

Source: Constantin Olariu Arimin | Adevăruri Ascunse (Hidden Truths)


The Philistines | Canaanites


FREE PALESTINE! (click on the picture to read the full study)

Some of the oldest written sources reveal that around 2.000 B.C., the Khabiru people – the word Khabiru being used with the meaning of mercenary, confederate, associate – were enlisted as soldiers to fight in the armies of the kings of Larsa and Assur. They appeared in the regions of Asia Minor, in the threshold between millennia and by the end of 3.000 B.C., they were to be found all around the borders of the Emesh/Sumerian states, and in the Hittite Empire, where they were wandering from place to place wherever they wanted, to their hearts’ desire. They were organized in tribal unions, whose leader was elected for military merits and their society was led by tribal elders and priests’ councils. According to Egyptian written records, this kingdom had close ties with Phoenicia and Palestine, which they controlled with the help of their army, alliances, as they pleased, or as times required during the reign of the 12th Dynasty (2.000 – 1.785 B.C.).

Towards the middle of the 18th century B.C., historical documents reveal the fact that the Hyksos tribes, who came out of the blue and occupied Egypt – where they introduced chariots in fighting – were pouring out as a river flooding over its banks into Hapi’s country. But some ancient sources tell us that in the same period and geographic area, these Scythians and Getae, coming from the dark northern Carpatho-Caspian territories, started pouring out like a flood of people chased by ghosts and ended up in the Pharaoh’s land, whose fighters they whacked badly.

It is for the first time in this century that the Getae and Scythians are mentioned as being in their predatory wanderings beyond the endless land, reaching the kingdom of the Pharaoh who “greeted” them with a mace and sword. This event is recorded by the Greek writer Ctesias, who lived at the end of the 5th century B.C., and who tells us that Sesostris, the pharaoh of Egypt, fought against Tanaus, the King of Scythians. The Greeks used to call the Don River with the name of Tanais, which was in fact the border between the Scythians and the Getae (Gomer and Magog), as described in the Apocryphal Stories of the Genesis. Since this historical fact proves to be true, it therefore throws the Mosaic letters into the garbage can of history.

Pompeius Trogus, a Roman who lived in the 1st century B.C., mentioned in his Philippic Histories that Tanaus, king of the Getae had defeated Vesosis, King of Egypt, along the banks of the Phasis River (possibly a branch of the Nile, flowing into the Delta). The Greek historian Philo of Byblos, who lived at the beginning of the 1st century A.D., translated into Greek the History of Phoenicians by Sanchuniathon, who had been a Phoenician historian of the 12th century B.C. This information got to us through the writings of Eusebius of Caesarea, who had quoted some passages from these texts. According to this wise man, the Phoenicians visited our homeland too and Pharaoh Sesostris even led an expedition against the Getae and the Scythians, but in fact the historical recorded data shows that the Egyptian leader defended his own country against the Ariminic invaders, who came from the Ister and The Black Sea to be warmed up by Ra. The legendary Phoenician historian states that he acquired all his sacred knowledge from the divine inscriptions engraved on the pillars of the Sun, found in the temples of Phoenicia. These kinds of pillars were also to be found at the court of Aetes, the Getae king, who lived in the 13th century B.C., and according to some ancient writers, they had the divine laws written on them, and these ancient writers were unbiased, and they were not sifted through the filter of those Sons of Darkness of the Militia Cristi, who have falsified history making up stories. Valerius Flaccus, a Latin poet who lived in the 1st century of our era, writes in Argonautica that: “Vesosis/Sesostris was the first one who declared war against the Getae, but being frightened by the defeat of his army he returned to Thebes on the Nile River, accompanied only by very few of his own men.”

Therefore we had a powerful state here, around the Carpathian Mountains, and we were skilled in dealing anyone a powerful blow with our army and weaponry.

The Judeo-Christian bishop Jordanes states in Getica 6:47 that: “This was the region where the Goths dwelt when Sesostris I (1.973-1.928 B.C.), king of the Egyptians, made war upon them. Their king at that time was Tanaus, the Scythian king (after whom the Tanais/Don river was supposedly named). In a battle at the river Phasis (Rioni, southwest of the Caucasus), whence come the birds called pheasants, which are found in abundance at the banquets of the powerful all over the world, Tanaus, king of the Goths, met Sesostris, king of the Egyptians, and there inflicted a severe defeat upon him, pursuing him all the way to Egypt. Had he not been restrained by the waters of the impassible Nile and the fortifications which Sesostris had long ago ordered to be made against the raids of the Ethiopians, he would have slain him in his own land.”

Let us ponder for a little while over what Jordanes wrote sometime in mid 6th century A.D., while the devilish ones were fueling their diabolical effort to falsify the history of the Getae, and especially that of the Judeo-Christians. The tricky old chap feeling himself so “inspired”, took the Goths out of the hat and substituted the Getae with them, even if the source he mentioned, Trogus Pompeius, who had written the story about 600 years before Jordanes, spoke only about the Getae, because the Goths were brought by the waves of history in mid 3rd century of our era. In order to remember the Ariminic nation, we have to take into account the fact that groups of Getae and Scythians ruffled the Pharaoh’s feathers very badly, right there in his own homeland, and had he not found his salvation in the southern area, where there were fortifications built to stop the Ethiopian invasion, he would have been butchered by these groups of predators. And these events overlap exactly this period of the Hyksos, mentioned in the Egyptian chronicles. Jordanes also tells us that part of the army retreated, and after conquering the entire Asia, some settled in these lands and others, led by their king, went back to their native Scythia, somewhere on the Don / Tanais and the Ister rivers. Here Jordanes writes the land as Scythia, but he uses a generic term, by which we have to understand the territory located north of the Ister River, north of the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, therefore he refers to the territories where the Getae and the Scythians were natives.

At the request of Ptolemy the Philadelphian, who was the king of Macedonia, Manetho, a Sebenite priest, wrote a history of Egypt in which he calls the Hyksos Heka khasewet and Sasewet, the meaning of the words being foreign rulers or shepherd kings, therefore he refers to the Royal Scythians mentioned by Herodotus, wherefrom the Greeks called them Hyksos. In some Egyptian texts the Hyksos appear under the name of Heku Sasu, and this is very similar to the word Saka or Saci, therefore these people were none other than the Scythians, because the Sacae were a branch of the Scythians. Their capital Avaris, according to Egyptian texts, was called Spune Daba, and I am going to bring further proof to the falsifiers of history! Also on the Lead Tablets discovered at Sinaia (Romania), the word Daba means city, and the Cosmography of the Anonymous from Ravenna, a 7th century writing, tells us that there was a city called Sacidaba, in Moesia Inferior (“daba” means “city”, and the “Saci” were a Scythian people from the Black Sea/Pontus Euxinus)…

Click here to read the full study.

Source: Constantin Olariu Arimin | Adevăruri Ascunse (Hidden Truths)


The Getae – Sons of the Earth

getae 1

Photo: Mircea Bezergheanu (click on the picture to read the full study)

Let us try to search the tracks, forgotten by time, of the words Getia and Getae, as others wrote them for the first time more than 5.200 years ago, as here, in the ancestral land, hate and ass kissing serve as all proof or logic of common sense in our history that’s been falsified and disparaged by all sorts of deadbeats and traitors of Kin and Country. But, for starters, let us clarify whence stems the word get, with its variants getu, gets, Geta and Getia. There is in known as Sumerian: ge: to tie the hair in a topknot, noble, land, wise, to make justice, faithful + ti: kinship, pride, wife, to endure, to be numerous and for the tu variant: radiance, to lead, to support, to delight, true, to marry, the four cardinal points. And for the word ta: father, person, to shine, character, to advise, integrity. From this sequence of meanings we can detach by ourselves some that will be of great import in our work of rummaging through the memory of time, little as the malicious and falsifiers have left for us, traces and shadows of the fabulous history and mythology of our Carpathian ancestors. In ancient times, this word did not define the national identity of the Carpathian people, it becoming an ethnonym perhaps  at the beginning of the 2nd millennium B.C., as the meanings I will ascribe henceforth will show more a defining trait of Folk Descended from Gods, rather than simply the people’s name. Combining the three ancient words, we have the following meanings: the topknotted kin, the chosen people, the wise kin, those who love justice, to lead with the power of truth, the kin spread in the four corners, the father with his hair in a topknot, the radiant land or the holy country. All these meanings, astounding for our culture and that of Europe, and yet others, still unknown until now, I shall clarify in what follows, so that there be some light in this satanic cesspool orchestrated by the Romanian Shitademy (mocking word for Academy).

Remarkable praise towards our ancestors can be found in the work Moral and political laws, published by Antet Publishing House, Bucharest 2010, attributed to Pythagoras (580 – 500 B.C.),  where ten references are made for the social and moral values of the Getae. In Law 1143, from page 70 onwards, stands written: “Travel to the Getae, not to give them laws, but to learn from them. With the Getae the fields are boundless, all lands are held in common. And among all peoples they are the wisest” Homer says.

Clement of Alexandria (150-215), in his work The Stromata 1,15 writes of the “barbarians” ideas and facts which today cannot be understood after so much Hellenist-elitist lie: “Thus philosophy, that most useful thing which sheds light over the nations, flourished long ago among barbarians. And afterwards came to Greece… L, 15 And it seems to me that it was in consequence of perceiving the boon conferred by the wise men who people themselves honored them, and philosophy was cultivated publicly by the Brahmans, the Odrysians, the Getae and the Egyptians. And thus they were deified by the Egyptians, the Chaldeans and the Arabians, being called “happy”, and by those who inhabit Palestine and no less by the Persian people, and countless other peoples besides these… Anacharsis, a Scythian, mentions that many barbarian philosophers had excelled among the Greeks… Moreover, he says that those specifically called by the fabulous name of Idaean Dactyli were the first wise men; to whom are attributed the invention of what are called The Ephesian letters” and of numbers in music. For which reason music was named after them. And the Idaean Dactyls were Phrygians and barbarians”. And Strabo in Geography X,3,19 leaves proof about this weird kin of Idaean Dactyls which were the discoverers of ironwork: “Thus is the difference of opinion which reigns in these traditions: some state that the Corybants, the Cabeiri, the Idaean Dactyls and the Telchines were the same as the Curetes; others claimed that they are merely related, and distinguishable through small differences; but, roughly speaking and in general, all of them, without exception, were a type of fanatics and bacchants which, in the guise of sacred servants, would strike  the spirits during sacred celebrations, partaking of games with noise and uproar, being armed and clanging cymbals, drums and weapons, and also with flutes and outcries.” He calls the Corybants the sons of Chronus, thus of the Celestial Father “being themselves the same as the Cabeiri” therefore the old titans from around the Carpathians and coming from the hearth of the creation of the world!

I’ll provide further clarification of the wisdom of our ancestors, coming from the Judeo-Christian Origen (185-245) where in the work Against Celsus we find precious information criticizing Celsus bitterly for ascribing our Getae ancestors a place of great honor in the tally of history and time: “Celsus has put together the Odrysians, the Samothracians and Eleusinians, as well as the Hyperboreans, considering them among the most ancient and wise of peoples.” And the wretched Judeo-Christian persists with his dissatisfaction of the Getae people by writing about our ancestors something that simply cannot seem to enter the heads of modern Romanians: “the Getae on the Danube are an old people and of very high wisdom“, precisely as the profound meanings of the words getu or geţi show us!

The same appreciations, inconceivable for the mioritic minds, can also be found in Jordanes’ work De origine actibusque Getarum where, at XI, 69 he praises the Getae for their native intelligence, thus: “What was auspicious for the Getae, what was simple, what was to be desired, was to bring to fruition what their adviser Deceneus had taught them to pursue in all things, judging it to be of use to them. And he, noticing that in their hearts they are ready to listen in everything, and that they possess a natural intelligence, initiated them in almost all philosophy; as he was in this respect a skillful master… What kind of joy will it be though, I wonder, to men so brave – with barely a respite between wars – to also drink of philosophical doctrines?”

To attempt to understand what is today inconceivable for almost all Romanians, the fabulous past of our Getae ancestors as shown in the previous quotes, but cruelly forged by the veritable flood of traitors of Kin and Country, I shall present yet other epigraphic and archaeological sources which prove our seniority on these lands from the very dawn of man’s break from his migratory hunter- gatherer state and his transition into sedentarism coming into modern times.

The Latin poet Vergil (70-19 B.C.) in The Aeneid at VI, 580, names the titans as “genus antiquum Terrae, Titania pubes…” therefore the ancient people of the Earth, the young titans, and the understanding of this expression, “titania pubes”, we find in the same writing, at IV, 179 which states:„Gigantes, Titanis ac terrae filii”, therefore these were, after the Roman culture of the 1st century B.C., the sons of Mother Earth, as we can find in the Essene writings or in those of the Getae that ended up in Palestine, or the first people after the olden culture which appeared on Earth, because this legend we’ll find even more fleshed-out with the shallow and thieving Greeks, who have Hellenized it so that none could riddle it out. The poet also mentions these bands of divinities at VI, 14-17 and VIII, 416 but also in Georgics IV, 173.

Yet these ideas, about the first bands of deities to have inhabited the Earth, we find expressed even earlier in the work Bellum Punicum by the Roman poet and dramaturgist Gnaeus Naevius (275-201 B.C.) who writes thus at 1,7: „Inerant signa expressa, quomodo Titani, Bicorpores Gigantes mag-nique Atlantcs, Runcus atque Purpureus, filii Terras”. And the translation for us is: There were clear markings of the titans, the giants with two bodies (these had, instead of legs, two snake bodies, but before the 4th century B.C. they were shown as fighters), the great Atlanteans. Runcus and even Purpureus are the children of Earth“. Also with the Latins we find information about the place in which descended from heavens, the bands of deities mentioned by the two Romans, who labored to build the human kin so as to enjoy the early Building of the world as they knew it in those times.

Click here to read the full study.

Source: Constantin Olariu Arimin | Adevăruri Ascunse (Hidden Truths)

Writing and the Carpathian runes


Photo: Viking runestone (click on the picture to read the full study)

At Lepenski Vir, a locality situated on the Serbian side of the Danube River, excavations were made, and they began in the year 1965, but after 1971 the place was covered by the river waters where the Porţile de Fier (The Iron Gates) Dam is located. Several settlements were uncovered on top of each other or near each other, and 136 of the constructions found there had several altars of worship. The archaeologists who studied them concluded that the settlement was founded sometime towards the end of 8.000 B.C.E., and they dated the constructions and the ceramics between 6.500 – 5.000 B.C. Among some other objects of cult discovered, there was an egg made of calcar which was chiseled on the outside, and it has some kind of serpents painted in red on a yellow background. On another egg made out of burnt clay, there are 35 carved signs, out of which only seven of them are not among those used in the writing on the Lead Tablets discovered at Sinaia, and three of them represent the Tree of Life, with slight differences between them.

In 2013, two sandstone tablets, as small as a box of matches were discovered in a field, where often times vestiges of our prehistory have been uncovered. The place is located in the village of Hândrești, Oțeleni commune in Iași County. They were from Cucuteni A and B periods, that is 5.500 – 3.500 B.C., because these ancient sites, at Cucuteni and Hândrești are approximately 40 kilometers far from each other, proof that our prehistoric civilization existed east of the Carpathian Mountains. The inscriptions on the two stone tablets are identical to the writing symbols of the Gets on the Lead Tablets discovered at Sinaia. Out of the 16 letters written on the two stone tablets (eight on each of them), three are symbols which represent theosophical concepts (the Lightning of the Heavenly Father, the Serpent of Knowledge and the Celestial Egg or the Universe) and 13 of them are letters with phonetic value, which appear 4.000 years later on the Lead Tablets discovered at Sinaia, therefore this also proves their authenticity.

The similarity between the written symbols used by the Gets on the Lead Tablets and the alphabets of Italy and Southern Gallia (8th and 6th centuries B.C.), of Old Iberia (12th century B.C.), of Palestine, of the Arabian Peninsula (13th century B.C.), of Mohenjo-Daro (22nd century B.C.), of Northern Africa (15th – 3rd century B.C.), even those of Siberia (5th century O.E.) shows the vast area in which the writing, that had originated in the lower basin of the Danube River spread out in all four directions, with the migration of groups of Ariminic Ausonians, who were looking for new places to stop, rest or make them their own.

In the southern part of Sweden, there is the province Götaland which in some old writings from the 7th century, parts of this region had the name of “Land of Geats” where the Getes or Geats lived. Their skillful ones say that these people came to the peninsula from Northern Germany and I agree, since they couldn’t pretend that they had come from the moon or from the heavens once with Odin. But after the New Edda, Odin – their main deity – came from the north of the Black Sea , territory then inhabited by the Getes, meaning he arrived at the Nordics together with a part of his people who settled in the south of the peninsula.

Click here to read the full study.

Source: Constantin Olariu Arimin | Adevăruri Ascunse (Hidden Truths)